When you buy a cup of coffee, a load of groceries, an airline ticket or a tank of gas these days, you probably pull out a customer loyalty card without even thinking about it. It might even be linked to how you pay.
[Photo: Dr. Laurence McMahon]
You may be thinking mostly about the perks you’re earning. But the place you’re buying from is focused on keeping your business, getting your positive word of mouth to family and friends – and even making you more tolerant of problems for the sake of rewards.
Now, a team from the University of Michigan School of Public Health has proposed that healthcare providers should offer the same kinds of programs – for reasons that go far beyond what other businesses use them for.
The main driver, they say, should be the need for hospitals, clinics and other providers to keep patients coming back to them so they can succeed as Accountable Care Organizations.
ACOs give healthcare providers a chance to earn extra payments if they provide high-quality care and keep healthcare cost growth down for a defined population of patients, in part by keeping patients healthy so they need less medical care.
Trouble is, those populations keep shifting. About 38 percent of those who saw doctors in a Medicare ACO’s network in a given year, according to one study, were seeing patients outside the ACO by the next year.
The federal rules for ACOs ensure that patients have freedom of choice for which doctors they see – but ACO-participating hospitals, clinics and doctors only get rewarded when they can coordinate patients’ care in a continuous way.
For instance, by encouraging patients to get screenings and preventive care, and reducing inappropriate use of care, ACOs can try to hold down the growth of costs while delivering high-quality care.
Plus, hospitals and clinics, even outside of ACOs, can earn bonuses based on how satisfied their patients say they are.
“Loyalty programs have the potential to enhance both health and financial benefits to patients and health system,” says Dr. Laurence McMahon, lead author of the piece who is chief of general medicine at Michigan and professor of health management and policy and professor of internal medicine at the medical school.
However, he and his colleagues note, healthcare loyalty programs should differ from coffee shop and gas station programs in a key way: they should never base their rewards solely on the basis of how often patients visit or receive care.
But offering perks to patients based on how long they’ve stayed with the same doctors, or how often they’ve chosen to receive the care they need from sites within the network, could work.
So could expanding the concept of the “network” that the patients can visit to earn perks – for instance, urgent care centers and pharmacies, or even restaurants and grocery stores offering healthy food programs.
Unlike hospital programs designed to cultivate wealthy patients by offering them different levels of hospital accommodations, food and clinic access, broad-based loyalty programs could be open to all patients.
While the new piece only lays out the concept of healthcare loyalty programs for others to consider, the authors point to the potential effects.
“Loyalty programs could empower patients to manage their health in new and innovative ways while enhancing the business model for health systems,” they write. “If successful, such programs may help improve both customer care and clinical care. That’s one membership card worth having.”
In addition to Dr. McMahon, the piece’s authors are corresponding author Dr. Vineet Chopra, and Dr. Renuka Tipirneni, both in the division of general medicine.
For more information, click here.