Self-reported data on diet is crucial to many trials that aim to change a person’s weight or eating behavior, but errors are an inevitable result of this type of measurement. To help solve this problem, Dr. Juned Siddique, faculty member at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Programs in Public Health, has received a National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant to develop a statistical framework for correcting measurement errors associated with self-reported diet assessments in longitudinal lifestyle intervention trials.
The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute will provide the three-year, $1.1 million grant.
In the study, Dr. Siddique and his team will examine the relationship between self-reported and objective measures of diet from four previous intervention trials to build the framework, which they hope will correct for errors in the dietary data.
Dr. Siddique explained how this work can help future investigators build more effective interventions for at-risk populations.
What are examples of lifestyle intervention trials that rely on self-reported diet assessment?
This work was directly motivated by my collaborations with Institute for Public Health and Medicine (IPHAM) faculty. In my project, I will use data from two intervention studies conducted here at IPHAM. One, led by Dr. Bonnie Spring was a randomized controlled trial designed to examine the feasibility and efficacy of an abbreviated smartphone-supported weight loss program. The other, led by Dr. Namratha Kandula, was a pilot study designed to determine the feasibility and initial efficacy of a culturally-targeted, community-based lifestyle intervention to improve physical activity and diet behaviors among medically underserved South Asians. In both studies, participants were asked to report their dietary intake over the course of the interventions.