Women age 55 and younger are less likely to exhibit the classic symptoms and underlying mechanisms of a heart attack commonly observed in men. This can leave women undiagnosed and at great risk.
But a new study, sponsored by Women’s Health Research at Yale, shows how a sex-specific classification system can define and group types of heart attacks that are more common for women. In doing so, the researchers have produced a more accurate guide to treatment and prognosis.
In the study, the researchers examined the medical records of women 55 years old and younger who were diagnosed with a heart attack, known as a myocardial infarction or acute myocardial infarction, using measurable cardiac symptoms and blood tests. The researchers gathered additional data, including the type of heart attack, as determined in part by cardiac catheterization, a procedure used to visualize the flow of blood to the heart for signs of obstruction.
The researchers found that nearly one in six women who had a heart attack could not be classified using the traditional Universal Definition. This system does not distinguish some mechanisms of a heart attack that are more common in younger women, such as arterial spasms or tears that inhibit blood flow to the heart without the presence of a plaque obstruction. In addition, many women have no evidence of blockages in the arteries and are therefore not accounted for in the traditional classification system. Without a new method for labeling these non-classic heart attacks, women are often uncertain about the diagnosis and left without clear guidance for treatment, said the researchers.
Dr. Harlan Krumholz, professor in the Institute for Social and Policy Studies, of Investigative Medicine (Health Policy) and of Yale School of Public Health was co-author of the study.Tags: Friday Letter Submission